首頁   聯絡我們
 
‧人權新知
 
‧世界人權宣言
 
高雄國際人權宣言
 
‧人權影音資料館藏
 
‧人權圖書資料館藏
 


The European Court of Human Rights found the fine reasonable (Photo: ECHR)

Human rights court refuses to hear undercover journalists’ case

The purchase of illegal fireworks was not essential for documentary says court

Two journalists who were each fined 6,000 kroner by police for buying illegal fireworks have had their cases to drop their fines rejected by the European Court of Human Rights, reports public broadcaster DR.

Jacob Adrian Mikkelsen and Henrik Lindahl Christensen from DR’s Aarhus bureau bought the fireworks after infiltrating the illegal firework market for a story highlighting their easy availability.

After consulting with police in Aarhus and Copenhagen on how to proceed after acquiring the fireworks, they were told to take them to a police station.

But while the Aarhus police decided they would not charge the journalists for illegally purchasing the fireworks as the work was in the public interest, Copenhagen police charged the journalists when they brought the fireworks to the police station.

After been convicted in both city and high court in 2006 and 2007, the journalists attempted to take their case to the European Court of Human Rights to protest their fines.

They attempted to invoke article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights that guarantees freedom of speech in order to break laws without punishment in cases of public interest.

The court dismissed the case, however, as it deemed the purchase of the fireworks as not essential to the story as they had access to illegal fireworks already impounded by police.

The court also drew attention to the fact that while the police were informed, they had not been granted prior immunity and the fines of 6,000 kroner were not excessive.

“We bought the fireworks because we thought it was important to document it for the program. The fireworks were labelled and that allowed us to trace them back to established importers in Denmark. This is important information for the public,” said DR’s head of documentary Steen Jensen.

“But the court found that the purchase wasn’t necessary to extent that DR could be absolved of guilt for breaking the law preventing the sale of these fireworks,” he added.


(2011-6-9/cphpost)

 
  2009 2010 2011 2012
 
6/7: Internet access a human right - UN report (3news)
6/7: Chiquita Human Rights Case Gets Split Decision in U.S. District Court (law.com)
6/8: Human rights case against cop (timesofindia)
6/8: Rights groups: no justice in Kyrgyzstan (timesunion.com)
6/9: Kharotabad shooting: Parliamentary panel to visit the site (The Express Tribune)
6/9: Human rights court refuses to hear undercover journalists’ case (cphpost)
6/10: Commentary: Brazil is improving on human rights (kansascity)
6/10: Human Rights Watch: Indonesia Should Act on Human Rights Commitment (thejakartaglobe)
6/11:Human Rights Watch under scrutiny over controversial Gacaca report (independent.co.ug)
6/11:Human rights groups welcome cancelled Bahrain GP(independent)
 
人權學堂 ∣Human Rights Learning Studio

位置:高雄捷運O5/R10美麗島穹頂大廳方向往出口9
Position: Kaohsiung MRT 05/R10 Formosa Boulevard Hall Exit 9
郵寄地址:81249高雄市小港區大業北路436號
Address: No. 436, Daye North Rd. Siaogang Dist., Kaohsiung City 81249, Taiwan
電話Tel:886-7-2357559∣傳真Fax:886-7-2351129
Email: hr-learning@ouk.edu.tw