
|
Rights group: China used force at Tibetan protests
BEIJING -- The New York-based group Human Rights Watch, in a report released Wednesday, said Chinese security forces used "disproportionate force" against peaceful, unarmed protesters and "acted with deliberate brutality" in suppressing widespread rioting in Tibet in March 2008.
The 73-page report accuses the security forces of engaging in "a pattern of deliberate brutality" against the protesters, and then systematically torturing detainees in prison while seeking evidence that exiled spiritual leader the Dalai Lama was behind the uprising. Human Rights Watch accused China of violating international law in quelling the protests.
"The scale of human rights violations related to suppressing the protests was far greater than previously believed," the report concludes. It also says "violations continue, including disappearances, wrongful convictions and imprisonment, persecution of families, and the targeting of people suspected of sympathizing with the protest movement."
The report said the Chinese government has kept the Tibetan plateau locked down for the past two years -- rarely allowing independent visits by foreign journalists, diplomats or the International Red Cross -- mainly to cover up the activities of the security forces.
In response, China's foreign ministry spokesman, Qin Gang, in a statement faxed to The Washington Post in Beijing, said Human Rights Watch "always has prejudice toward China."
"It was absolutely not so-called 'peaceful protest' or 'non violence' behavior, but severe violent crimes, which caused serious loss to the lives and property of the local people and destroyed the order of the local society seriously," Qin said.
Qin said the security forces in Tibet acted "in accordance with the law and in a civilized manner from the beginning to the end." He added, "The judicial rights of the defendants were fully guaranteed, as well as their ethnic customs and personal dignity. This is the fact."
The Chinese government has consistently rejected claims that its forces acted excessively, and has refused previous demands for an international inquiry, saying Tibet is a domestic matter.
(2010-07-25/Washington Post)
|