首頁   聯絡我們
 
‧人權新知
 
‧世界人權宣言
 
高雄國際人權宣言
 
‧人權影音資料館藏
 
‧人權圖書資料館藏
 



The Human Rights-based Approach (1)

Since 1988, UNICEF has been a leading architect and proponent of the human right-based approach to programming to fulfill the rights of women and children under the convention and CEDAW. The organization's country programmes are guided by human rights principles applied in all phases and sectors.

The human rights-based approach is derived from principles that underlie convention, accountability, universality and non-discrimination, indivisibility and participation. It is firmly embedded in the work of the United Nations, which in 2003 passed a statement of "Common Understanding" of a human rights-based approach in development cooperation. Under this paradigm an underlying aim of all UN programmes is to advance the realization of human rights as laid down in the universal declaration of human rights and other major human rights instruments.

Human rights are innate to all people, irrespective of their ethnic origin, beliefs and practices, geographic location, gender or income level. Yet despite robust international and national legal frameworks in support of human rights, the social groups that have traditionally suffered from marginalization and discrimination within their countries and societies are still consistently the most at risk of having their rights violated or unfulfilled.

A human rights-based approach specifically targets the most marginalized groups and the most vulnerable members of these groups which are often women and children – in the countries and communities with the greatest need. The approach has implications for programme budgets and planning, as it is often more costly to reach marginalized group or people or urban slums than in more mainstream areas. Immunization provides an example, where unit costs of vaccinating infants in rural areas are far higher than for their counterparts living in cities.

Under human rights-based approach to immunization, an alternative measure for determining programme priorities and allocating resources may be employed. Using the number of deaths prevented as a determining factor in resource allocation immediately changes the cost-benefit equation, since poorer or more marginalized groups are likely to benefit most from the extension of essential services.

Innovative solutions are often required to fulfill the rights of marginalized and disadvantaged children and families.

By Alula Berhe Kidani


(2011-9-17/SudanVisionDaily)

 
  2009 2010 2011 2012
 
9/13:Amnesty Presents Human Rights Agenda For Change To New Libyan Regime (RTTNews)
9/13:Human Rights Watch criticizes Dutch regulations for transgender registrations (Associated Press)
9/14:Victoria Backpedals on Human Rights (Pro Bono Australia)
9/14: DR CONGO: Specialised Court for Serious Human Rights Abuses (ipsnews.net)
9/15: Traveller rights being abused, claims UN adviser (The Irish Times)
9/15: No commitment to human rights laws (abc.net.au)
9/16: Egypt emergency law expansion erodes human rights: Amnesty (TheDailyStar)
9/16: UN urges probe into alleged human rights abuses in Yemen (Yemen Observer)
9/17: Internet a Human Right (TRCB News)
9/17: The Human Rights-based Approach (1) (SudanVisionDaily)
 
人權學堂 ∣Human Rights Learning Studio

位置:高雄捷運O5/R10美麗島穹頂大廳方向往出口9
Position: Kaohsiung MRT 05/R10 Formosa Boulevard Hall Exit 9
郵寄地址:81249高雄市小港區大業北路436號
Address: No. 436, Daye North Rd. Siaogang Dist., Kaohsiung City 81249, Taiwan
電話Tel:886-7-2357559∣傳真Fax:886-7-2351129
Email: hr-learning@ouk.edu.tw