首頁   聯絡我們
 
‧人權新知
 
‧世界人權宣言
 
高雄國際人權宣言
 
‧人權影音資料館藏
 
‧人權圖書資料館藏
 



Responsible businesses should back guidelines

Please respect FT.com's ts&cs and copyright policy which allow you to: share links; copy content for personal use; & redistribute limited extracts. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights or use this link to reference the article - http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b2cfe3d0-29a4-11e0-bb9b-00144feab49a.html#ixzz1CCkoCt9f

Sir, Sir Mark Moody-Stuart (Letters, January 20) speaks of wide business support for the new United Nations “protect, respect, remedy” framework for business and human rights and its draft guiding principles. One would expect similar enthusiasm for the current update of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development guidelines for multinational enterprises.

The OECD guidelines give expression to all three pillars of the UN framework: the state duty to protect, the corporate responsibility to respect, and access to remedy. Endorsed by governments, they provide recommendations to multinational enterprises for responsible business conduct across a range of areas, including human rights, employment and the environment. Signatory governments are required to establish a complaints mechanism to respond to alleged violations by multinational companies operating within their territory or abroad. Last reviewed in 2000, the update aims to strengthen the relevance and implementation of the OECD guidelines, in light of the UN framework, in particular by upgrading the human rights provisions, broadening the scope and improving the poorly performing complaints mechanism.

Is business playing an active, positive role in the update? Not so far. It has confined its enthusiasm to supporting a strong promotional agenda when what most needs strengthening is the languishing complaints mechanism that continues to deny workers and other victims of corporate-related abuse access to effective remedy. The OECD guidelines are neither “watertight” nor “perfect”, but they’re the best we’ve got. This update provides a once-in-a-decade chance to make them work. Responsible businesses should support the update.


(2010-1-27/ft.com)

 
  2009 2010 2011 2012
 
1/26:Human Rights Watch: Gulf countries step up harassment on advocates for political change(The Associated Press)
1/26:US calls for sacking UN human rights expert(msn news)
1/27:Responsible businesses should back guidelines(ft.com)
1/27:MPs Plot Minority Report On Kings Bill(allafrica)
1/28:Protesting OSU students support Egyptian riots for human rights (thelantern)
1/28:No human rights case for fired bald waitress(nationalpost)
1/29:Obama Administration Cut Funding to Promote Democracy in Egypt, Disappointing Human Rights Activists (foxnews)
1/29:Human rights activist barred from speaking at Colombo University event(sundaytimes)
1/30:Cambodia 'tears up freedom to muffle dissent' (channelnewsasia)
1/30:How British judges are 'overprotecting' criminals' human rights (telegraph)
 
人權學堂 ∣Human Rights Learning Studio

位置:高雄捷運O5/R10美麗島穹頂大廳方向往出口9
Position: Kaohsiung MRT 05/R10 Formosa Boulevard Hall Exit 9
郵寄地址:81249高雄市小港區大業北路436號
Address: No. 436, Daye North Rd. Siaogang Dist., Kaohsiung City 81249, Taiwan
電話Tel:886-7-2357559∣傳真Fax:886-7-2351129
Email: hr-learning@ouk.edu.tw